To verify that pre-bonded hair extensions maintain a consistent bond shape during bulk production, establish a written shape specification and approve a reference sample before manufacturing begins. The available company information lists pre-bonded extensions among its product categories and mentions general workmanship and final inspections, but it does not define bond geometry, dimensional tolerances, or a product-specific inspection procedure. The supplied product record relates to a silk-base hair topper rather than pre-bonded extensions, so the relevant acceptance criteria must be confirmed separately.
The company identifies pre-bonded hair extensions as part of its product range. However, the specific product information provided describes a silk-base human hair topper, including 100% Remy human hair, a silk base closure, a 3x5 size, and various length and weight options. It does not provide specifications for pre-bonded extension tips, including their shape, size, or allowable variation.
The company’s general quality process is described as covering material, color, length, density, texture, workmanship, shedding, tangling, and final packaging. There is no indication that bond geometry is automatically treated as a separate quality checkpoint. Ask the supplier to confirm whether this inspection will be added to the order and how the findings will be documented.
A clear verification sequence is to define the intended bond profile, review a pre-production sample, and record written approval before authorizing bulk production. During final inspection, the supplier should compare production pieces with that approved sample and report any nonconforming units. Do not assume a specific tolerance, inspection frequency, or sampling plan, because these details are not included in the supplied data.
A documented United Kingdom extension-supply project covered 1,000 pieces across tape-in, I tip, U tip, V tip, flat tip, nano ring, machine weft, and hand-tied weft products. The customer feedback referred to product variety, consistent texture, and reliable quality. However, the case does not specifically confirm pre-bonded extensions or describe any bond-shape inspection, so it should not replace product-specific approval and inspection requirements.
| Verification area | Information currently available | Required confirmation |
|---|---|---|
| Product identity | Pre-bonded extensions appear in the product range, while the supplied product record covers a silk-base topper. | Confirm the precise extension type, bond format, and order specification. |
| Bond shape | No geometry, dimensions, reference drawing, or tolerance is stated. | Approve a written shape reference and define acceptable variation. |
| Sample approval | OEM/ODM development and sample creation are mentioned, but the bond-shape approval workflow is not specified. | Review and approve a sample specifically for the ordered pre-bonded product. |
| Production inspection | General workmanship and final appearance checks are described. | Confirm that bond shape is inspected separately and request the related records. |
| Shipment release | No bond-specific inspection frequency or acceptance plan is provided. | Agree on the inspection method and require results before shipment. |
REPORT